Intel Celeron T3500 vs Intel Celeron T3300: comparison
Comparison of Intel Celeron T3500 and Intel Celeron T3300: key differences and a full specification table.
Key differences
Intel Celeron T3500 has a higher base clock (2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz).
Both processors match on: core count (2), TDP (35 W), process node (45 nm).
These are specification values: they show differences between the models but do not determine a performance winner. For a specific workload, rely on independent benchmarks.
Key specifications
| Parameter | Intel Celeron T3500 | Intel Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 2 | 2 / 2 |
| TDP | 35 W | 35 W |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Full specification table
Differing values are highlighted. This is not a better/worse rating: numbers from different architectures are not always comparable.
| Parameter | Intel Celeron T3500 | Intel Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Model | T3500 | T3300 |
| Codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Product line | Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron | Устаревший процессор Intel Celeron |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Launch date | Q3 2010 | Q1 2010 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Servicing status | End of Servicing Updates | End of Servicing Updates |
| Embedded options available | No | No |
| CPU | ||
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | — | 2 |
| Multithreading (SMT/HT) | — | No |
| Base clock | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Cache (level unspecified) | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Bus speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| TDP | 35 W | 35 W |
| Turbo Boost | — | No |
| 64-bit support | — | Yes |
| Instruction set width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Package and thermal | ||
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | — |
| Die size | 107 mm² | 107 mm² |
| Transistors (millions) | 410 million | 410 million |
| Security and virtualization | ||
| Virtualization (VT-x / AMD-V) | — | No |
| Execute Disable Bit | — | Yes |
| Intel Trusted Execution Technology | — | No |
| Technologies | ||
| Enhanced SpeedStep | — | No |